|
|
|
|
|
|
What
we do |
. |
| |
For
some clients, we conduct the entire process. In other
situations, we provide just the level of support you need to
conduct most of the work yourself. Some of the key steps:
- Selecting the
number and location of focus groups.
- Inviting
participants.
- Identifying the
right questions.
- Preparing the
interviewing guides.
- Collating and
analyzing the findings.
- Developing
practical and actionable
recommendations.
- Presenting the
results to executives in a way that gets
results.
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
How
we're
different |
|
| |
- Our
proprietary process for helping you select the fewest possible
focus group locations that will provide you with the greatest
possible variation in perspectives on the research topic.
- Our interview
guides are structured in a way that allows for
absolute consistency in the way each session is
conducted, regardless of how many different
facilitators are involved.
- Our reports are
highly visual, illustrating to what extent
different groups agree and disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sample
projects
Focus Groups |
|
Pretest new
strategy: A new leadership team was about to roll
out their 13 key strategies to employees in the form
of a video. We pretested each of the points in focus
groups, as well as the intended communication channel.
The findings completely changed the roll-out. The 13
strategies were reduced to five. Several were
completely rewritten to avoid some highly negative
reactions during the pretest. Examples were provided
that addressed the most common questions we heard
during the pretest. And the method of communication
for the introduction was completely overhauled.
Result: an overwhelmingly positive launch with
employee emails and letters continuing for weeks
afterward. Improve survey
results: A repeat survey showed virtually no
improvement in key communication metrics over two
years, in spite of the communication department's best
efforts. We conducted focus groups to identify
specific interventions that would make a difference,
and found a great many opportunities on the
operational side, such as communication during shift
changes. Another key finding was that everyone's
expectations of supervisory communication were
different and not very well defined. As a result of
the study, the communication staff reorganized
themselves to better support operational management,
and plant managers became committed to making changes
in communication that measurably helped their bottom
lines.
Retool the global
magazine: A new communication director inherited
an existing global publication and needed some
employee input to see how effectively it was meeting
the company's objectives. Focus groups we conducted in
the U.S, Europe and Asia showed some surprising
similarities in what was working well and what wasn't,
although sometimes for different reasons.
Interestingly, some of the techniques executives
thought to be most effective in showing the company to
be a great place to work were, in fact, making
employees feel patronized and alienated.
|
|
|
|
©
2010 Sinickas Communications, Inc., All Rights Reserved. This
Website, and all its content, is the exclusive property of
Sinickas Communications, Inc., and is protected by US and
international copyright laws. You may not reproduce, distribute,
transmit, incorporate into any publication, product, Website or
computer network, or use the content in any other way whatsoever
without the express written permission of Sinickas Communications,
Inc. |